Attorney On Call 24/7

737-937-5786

Free Consultation

Drug Trafficking & Delivery Defense in San Marcos & Hays County

Drug delivery and manufacturing charges in Texas carry significantly higher penalties than simple possession. The prosecution infers intent to deliver from circumstantial evidence — packaging, quantity, scales, cash — and every piece of that inference is contestable. IH-35 drug trafficking arrests carry both state and federal exposure on large quantities. Trial-tested defense. Former Travis County DWI prosecutor on staff. Over 930 dismissals or rejected cases since 2021. Call 737-937-5786.

Free Consultation737-937-5786 — 24/7
✓ Intent to Deliver Defense✓ Federal Exposure Evaluated✓ Hays County Courts✓ Available 24/7
Litigator of the Year 2023 — drug trafficking defense attorney San Marcos Hays CountyMark Hull
Expertise.com Best Criminal Defense Lawyers Hays County — drug delivery defense TexasMark Hull*
National Trial Lawyers Top 100 — drug trafficking defense attorney San MarcosMark Hull — 2022
Top 40 Under 40 — Allison Tisdale former prosecutor drug trafficking defenseAllison Tisdale — 2022
Lawyers of Distinction — drug trafficking defense attorney Hays County TexasMark Hull
Criminal Defense Top 10 — drug delivery defense San Marcos TexasMark Hull

*Based on the quality and quantity of reviews and average minimum rating for a law firm practicing criminal defense in Austin, TX researched by expertise.com

Drug Trafficking in Hays County — How Intent to Deliver Is Alleged and How It’s Challenged

Manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance is charged under Health & Safety Code §481.112 (PG1), §481.113 (PG2), and related statutes. “Delivery” under Texas law is defined broadly: it includes actual transfer, constructive transfer, and an offer to sell. A person who never physically handed drugs to anyone can be charged with delivery if the prosecution alleges they offered to sell or constructively transferred a controlled substance. “Manufacture” includes producing, preparing, or processing a controlled substance — even without a lab.

The most common drug trafficking charge in Hays County is possession with intent to deliver (PWID) — where the prosecution charges delivery not because it observed a transaction, but because it infers intent from the evidence at the scene: large quantity, individually bagged portions, a digital scale, a significant amount of cash, or text messages referencing sales. Every element of that inferential chain is a defense target. A large quantity without any packaging equipment, scales, or communication evidence is a very different case from one with all of those elements. We evaluate each piece of the prosecution’s circumstantial evidence separately before making any recommendation.

IH-35 runs directly through Hays County, making it a primary interstate drug trafficking corridor. Large-quantity arrests on IH-35 frequently trigger parallel federal investigation under 21 U.S.C. §841. Federal drug trafficking charges carry mandatory minimum sentences that are significantly longer than their state counterparts. We evaluate federal exposure from the first consultation on every trafficking case involving large quantities. Call 737-937-5786 the moment of the arrest.

  • ✓ Payment Plans Available
  • ✓ Local San Marcos Law Firm
  • ✓ Affordable Fees
  • ✓ Award-Winning Firm
Get a free, confidential case evaluation →

Texas Drug Penalty Groups — Charges & Penalties

The penalty group is the prosecution’s first allegation. The quantity determines the charge level. Both must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt — and both are challengeable.

Penalty Group 1
Cocaine • Heroin • Methamphetamine • Fentanyl • Oxycodone • Hydrocodone
<1gState Jail Felony180 days–2 yrs
1–4g3rd Degree Felony2–10 yrs
4–200g2nd Degree Felony2–20 yrs
200–400g1st Degree Felony5–99 yrs
400g+Enhanced 1st Degree10–99 yrs
Penalty Group 2
MDMA • Psilocybin • PCP • THC Concentrate • Vape Cartridges • Wax • Edibles
<1gState Jail Felony180 days–2 yrs
1–4g3rd Degree Felony2–10 yrs
4–400g2nd Degree Felony2–20 yrs
400g+1st Degree Felony5–99 yrs
⚠ THC vape cartridges & edibles are PG 2, NOT marijuana
Penalty Group 3 & 4
PG 3: Xanax • Ritalin • Valium • Anabolic Steroids
PG 4: Compound preparations containing narcotics
<28g (PG3)Class A MisdemeanorUp to 1 year
28–200g3rd Degree Felony2–10 yrs
200–400g2nd Degree Felony2–20 yrs
Marijuana (Separate Statute)
Cannabis flower only — NOT THC concentrate or edibles
≤2 ozClass B MisdemeanorUp to 180 days
2–4 ozClass A MisdemeanorUp to 1 year
4 oz–5 lbsState Jail Felony180 days–2 yrs
5–50 lbs3rd Degree Felony2–10 yrs

Drug-free zone enhancements under §481.134 apply within 1,000 feet of schools and other protected locations. These must be specifically alleged and proven — and are specifically contestable.

Drug trafficking defense San Marcos — intent to deliver challenge and IH-35 trafficking arrest defense Hays County

Challenging the Intent to Deliver Inference

The prosecution almost never observes an actual drug transaction and then files delivery charges. What it does is find drugs at a traffic stop or a residence, observe other items at the scene, and then infer intent to deliver. The inference runs like this: large quantity + individual packaging + digital scale + cash = intent to deliver. Each of those items is a separate piece of circumstantial evidence. Each is individually challengeable.

A digital scale is consistent with personal use by someone monitoring dosing. Cash is consistent with any number of legitimate purposes. Individual baggies are sold at every gas station in Texas. A large quantity might simply mean bulk personal use by someone with a substance dependency rather than commercial dealing. The combination of all four items is stronger than any one alone — but the combination is still an inference, and an inference can be challenged with specific counter-evidence and argument.

We request every item of evidence the prosecution plans to use to support its intent-to-deliver theory and evaluate each piece separately. We challenge the weight and quantity determination, the character of the packaging, any text messages or electronic evidence alleged to show sales, and the officer’s experience and basis for concluding the quantity was inconsistent with personal use. Allison Tisdale prosecuted delivery cases before joining the defense and knows exactly how DA Kelly Higgins’s office builds its intent argument — and what its weakest links typically are.

Drug trafficking defense attorneys San Marcos — Mark Hull and Allison Tisdale defending delivery and manufacturing charges Hays County

How We Defend Drug Trafficking Charges in Hays County

Delivery and manufacturing charges require attacking the intent inference, the underlying stop, and — on large-quantity cases — the federal exposure simultaneously.

01
Fourth Amendment first — always

The stop or search that uncovered the drugs is the first line of defense. If the IH-35 traffic stop lacked legal justification, or the residence search was conducted without a valid warrant or recognized exception, the entire evidentiary foundation collapses. A suppressed delivery charge carries the same outcome as a suppressed possession charge: no evidence, no case.

02
Dismantle the intent to deliver inference piece by piece

We evaluate every item the prosecution will use to infer intent: the quantity, the packaging, the scales, the cash, the cell phone evidence. Each item is assessed independently and collectively. Counter-evidence — a documented substance use disorder, a legitimate reason for the cash, the absence of common delivery paraphernalia — can rebut the inference.

03
Challenge the quantity and reduce the charge level

The weight determines whether a delivery charge is a state jail felony, second-degree, first-degree, or enhanced first-degree. We scrutinize the lab’s weight measurement, the adulterant question, and whether the weight places the substance in the charged tier or below it. A weight reduction across a tier boundary reduces the charge level and the entire penalty range.

04
Evaluate federal exposure immediately

For large-quantity cases on IH-35 or involving quantities that reach federal threshold levels, parallel federal prosecution is a real possibility. Federal drug trafficking carries mandatory minimum sentences that begin at 5 years for threshold amounts and escalate significantly. We evaluate federal exposure from the first consultation and coordinate with federal defense counsel when necessary.

05
Challenge drug-free zone enhancements specifically

If the prosecution has alleged a drug-free zone enhancement, we verify that the specific location of the alleged delivery actually falls within the statutory distance from a qualifying facility and that the measurement methodology was proper. Drug-free zone allegations are frequently loose and are specifically contestable.

06
Negotiate the charge level when dismissal requires it

When outright dismissal is not achievable, the difference between a delivery charge and a possession charge is significant — both in prison exposure and in record consequences. We negotiate specifically to reduce delivery charges to possession where the evidence does not clearly support the delivery level.

Drug Trafficking Defense — Former Prosecutor, 20+ Years, Hays County

Mark Hull has defended drug delivery and manufacturing cases in Hays County courts and the Hays County District Courts for over 20 years. Delivery cases require a different defense strategy than possession cases — the intent inference is the prosecution’s central theory, and dismantling it requires specific legal and factual arguments.

Allison Tisdale prosecuted drug delivery cases as a Texas state prosecutor before joining the defense. She has filed intent-to-deliver charges and knows exactly what evidence DA Kelly Higgins’s office considers sufficient for delivery versus what it knows is a close call on the inference question. That inside knowledge shapes every delivery defense we build. We carry a 5.0 rating across 363 Google reviews and Over 930 dismissals or rejected cases since 2021 across Central Texas courts.

◆ Trial-Tested Criminal Defense

20+ years of Texas criminal defense experience. Hays, Travis, Williamson, and Caldwell county courts. Mark Hull.

◆ Former State Prosecutor on Staff

Allison Tisdale prosecuted criminal cases as a Texas state prosecutor. She knows how DA Kelly Higgins’s office builds drug cases — and where they fall apart.

◆ Tried Cases to Verdict in Hays County

When the evidence supports going to trial, we go. That changes how the prosecution values every negotiation at every prior stage.

◆ Over 930 dismissals or rejected cases since 2021

Hays County, Travis County, Williamson County — drug charges, DWI, assault, and felonies of every level.

Over 930dismissal or rejected cases since 2021
5.0Google Rating (363 Reviews)
20+Years in Hays County Courts

Drug Trafficking FAQ — Hays County & San Marcos

Common questions about drug delivery and manufacturing charges in Texas — answered with specific statute citations and Hays County court details.

Simple possession under Health & Safety Code §481.115 requires only that you knowingly possessed a controlled substance. Delivery under §481.112 requires that you transferred, constructively transferred, or offered to sell a controlled substance — or that you possessed it with intent to deliver. The same quantity of drugs carries a higher charge level when charged as delivery rather than possession. The distinction between possession and PWID (possession with intent to deliver) is often the central negotiation issue in drug trafficking cases.

Intent to deliver is almost never proven by direct evidence of an observed transaction. It is proven circumstantially from: the quantity of the substance (more than consistent with personal use), individual unit packaging (separate baggies rather than a single container), the presence of a scale, the presence of significant cash, and electronic communication evidence referencing sales. Each item of circumstantial evidence is individually contestable. We challenge each piece of the prosecution’s intent inference and present counter-evidence explaining each item consistently with personal use rather than distribution.

Yes — delivery and manufacturing charges are dismissible through suppression of the underlying evidence (Fourth Amendment), successful challenge to the intent to deliver inference, and lab or chain of custody challenges. A successful suppression motion eliminates the evidentiary foundation of the delivery charge entirely. When suppression is not available, a successful challenge to the intent inference can result in reduction to a possession charge or dismissal when the remaining evidence is insufficient. We have achieved dismissals on PWID and delivery charges in Hays County.

Yes — and this is a critical issue on large-quantity cases. IH-35 is a primary interstate drug corridor and DEA agents operate along it in cooperation with Hays County law enforcement. Federal drug trafficking under 21 U.S.C. §841 carries mandatory minimum sentences that apply regardless of a judge’s sentencing discretion: 5 years minimum for threshold quantities of cocaine, meth, or heroin; 10 years for larger quantities. These minimums are significantly longer than their state counterparts. We evaluate federal exposure from the first consultation on every trafficking case involving quantities that could reach federal threshold levels.

Health & Safety Code §481.134 enhances drug delivery and manufacturing penalties when the offense occurs within 1,000 feet of a school, 300 feet of a school or youth center, or in certain other protected locations. The enhancement eliminates the option of a suspended sentence and increases the minimum term. Drug-free zone enhancements must be specifically alleged and proven. We verify whether the specific location actually falls within the statutory distance and whether the measurement was properly documented.

Delivery or manufacture of methamphetamine (PG1) in Texas under H&S Code §481.112: less than 1 gram is a state jail felony (180 days to 2 years); 1 to 4 grams is a second-degree felony (2 to 20 years); 4 to 200 grams is a first-degree felony (5 to 99 years or life); 200 to 400 grams carries an enhanced first-degree penalty (10 to 99 years or life, $100,000 fine); over 400 grams carries the maximum enhancement (15 to 99 years or life, $250,000 fine). These are state penalties. Parallel federal prosecution under 21 U.S.C. §841 applies to threshold quantities and carries its own mandatory minimum structure.

Yes — and this is one of the primary negotiation objectives when outright dismissal is not achievable. Reducing a delivery charge to a possession charge of the same substance and weight can mean the difference between a 2nd or 1st degree felony and a state jail felony or lower-level felony. The reduction depends on challenging the sufficiency of the intent-to-deliver evidence and demonstrating to DA Kelly Higgins’s office that the circumstantial inference is not strong enough to support the delivery charge at trial. Allison Tisdale’s prosecutorial experience is directly relevant to this negotiation.

Call 737-937-5786 immediately. Do not make any statements about the drugs, who they belong to, where they came from, or what they were for. Do not attempt to explain the packaging, the cash, or any other items found. Every statement you make can be used to reinforce the prosecution’s intent inference. The Fourth Amendment analysis, the quantity and identification challenges, and the federal exposure evaluation all need to start the day of the arrest. Call us before you talk to anyone else.

Drug Defense Resources — San Marcos & Hays County

Related pages covering drug charges and criminal defense in San Marcos and Hays County.

Drug Charges Hub

All drug charge types in Hays County — penalty groups, quantities, and defense overview.

Controlled Substance Possession

PG1–PG4 possession charges — the possession-level defense on trafficking cases.

Marijuana Possession

Marijuana delivery charges — weight tiers and intent defense in Hays County.

Drug Paraphernalia

Paraphernalia frequently alleged alongside delivery charges in Hays County.

Criminal Defense San Marcos

Full criminal defense hub for all charge types in Hays County.

Jail Release

Bond and release after a trafficking arrest — what to expect in Hays County.

Expungement San Marcos

Clearing a dismissed drug charge from your record under Texas Chapter 55.

Hays County Courts Guide

Guide to the Hays County District Courts where drug trafficking cases are heard.

What Our Clients Say

5.0 stars • 363 Google reviews from clients across Hays County, Travis County, and Central Texas.

RL
Ronnicka Lopez
★★★★★
Google

“After two years, the case was dismissed and dropped. They made this whole ordeal easy, kept me in the loop, told me exactly what to expect. Mrs. Allison is such an amazing and sweet lady — the whole team. I see exactly why they received multiple awards for best law firm in the state.”

BS
Blake Shires
★★★★★
Google

“My case was dismissed. Mr. Hull was patient, attentive, and consistently communicative from start to finish. He explained every step and made sure I felt supported throughout. I highly recommend Mark Hull and The Hull Firm.”

SH
Shawn Hallman
★★★★★
Google

“These attorneys were responsive, intelligent, and relentless. I appreciated how they always had a plan and stayed one step ahead. If you’re facing criminal charges, you want them on your side.”

Drug Trafficking Charge in San Marcos or Hays County? Call Us Now.

Intent to deliver is an inference — not a fact. The stop may not have been legal. The federal exposure needs to be evaluated today. Call 737-937-5786 — 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Free Consultation737-937-5786

For educational purposes only. Not legal advice. Contact us for a free, confidential consultation specific to your case.

1