Theft Charges in Bexar County — Why the Value Is Only the Starting Point
Theft under Penal Code §31.03 requires proof that you unlawfully appropriated property with intent to deprive the owner of it. Every word in that definition is a potential defense point. “Unlawfully appropriated” means the taking was without the owner’s effective consent — which is a question of what the owner actually knew and agreed to. “Intent to deprive” means the prosecution must prove you intended to permanently or substantially deprive the owner of the property — not merely that you borrowed it, forgot to pay, or made a mistake. The charge level is set by the value of the property allegedly taken — but the value itself must be proven, and methods used by retailers and loss prevention departments to establish value are frequently contestable.
San Antonio’s large retail presence — North Star Mall, The Shops at La Cantera, Rolling Oaks Mall, Ingram Park Mall, and major HEB, Walmart, Target, and Home Depot locations throughout the city — generates a significant volume of retail theft cases in the Bexar County Courts at Law. Retail theft cases have a specific evidence structure: loss prevention officer testimony, video surveillance, and the retailer’s valuation of the merchandise. All three are challengeable. Loss prevention officers are not law enforcement. Their observations, their detention authority, and the circumstances of the alleged offense are all subject to specific legal scrutiny.
A theft conviction — even a Class B misdemeanor for property valued between $100 and $750 — creates a permanent record that appears on every background check. Employers and landlords routinely screen for theft convictions. Certain professional licenses are affected. Dismissal through suppression, deferred adjudication, or pretrial diversion is always the primary goal. Call 210-692-4913.
- ✓ Payment Plans Available
- ✓ San Antonio Office
- ✓ Affordable Fees
- ✓ Award-Winning Firm








