Texas Harassment Law §42.07 — Penalties, Charges & Austin Defense

Texas Penal Code §42.07 makes harassment a Class B misdemeanor, covering repeated phone calls, texts, emails, and social media contact made with intent to harass. A prior conviction elevates it to a Class A misdemeanor. Mark Hull has 20+ years of Austin criminal defense experience. Allison Tisdale is a former Travis County prosecutor. Call 512-599-9999 — available 24/7.

✓ Texas Penal Code §42.07 Defense ✓ Electronic & Phone Harassment ✓ Former Travis County Prosecutor ✓ Available 24/7
Litigator of the Year 2023 — Austin harassment defense attorneyMark Hull
Expertise.com Best Criminal Defense Lawyers AustinMark Hull*
National Trial Lawyers Top 100 — Austin criminal defense attorneyMark Hull — 2022
Top 40 Under 40 — Allison Tisdale former Travis County DWI prosecutorAllison Tisdale — 2022
Lawyers of Distinction — Austin criminal defense attorneyMark Hull
Criminal Defense Top 10 — Austin harassment lawyerMark Hull

*Based on the quality and quantity of reviews and average minimum rating for a law firm practicing criminal defense in Austin, TX researched by expertise.com

Texas Penal Code §42.07 — What Harassment Means Under Texas Law

Texas Penal Code §42.07 defines harassment as intentionally communicating with another person in a way intended to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass them. It is a Class B misdemeanor punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a $2,000 fine. The statute covers repeated phone calls, threatening or obscene electronic messages, contact through fake accounts or third parties, and false reports of injury or death. A prior harassment conviction elevates the charge to a Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year, $4,000). Sending obscene content to a minor is a state jail felony (180 days–2 years, $10,000).

The statute is broad by design, which creates two problems for the accused: almost any repeated communication can be characterized as harassment, and the prosecution can infer intent from the pattern of conduct even if no single message was overtly threatening. The central battleground is whether the communication had a legitimate purpose and whether intent to harass can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mark Hull has defended harassment cases in Austin for over 20 years. Allison Tisdale prosecuted cases as a former Travis County prosecutor and understands exactly how the DA’s office evaluates harassment files. Call 512-599-9999 for a free, confidential consultation.

Harassment Penalty Levels Under Texas Penal Code §42.07

Charge LevelTriggerMax JailMax Fine
Class B Misdemeanor First offense 180 days $2,000
Class A Misdemeanor Prior harassment conviction 1 year $4,000
State Jail Felony Obscene content — minor victim 180 days–2 years $10,000

A conviction at any level creates a permanent criminal record affecting employment, housing, and professional licensing. Non-citizens face potential immigration consequences.

What Conduct Texas Penal Code §42.07 Covers

The statute requires intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass. The following conduct qualifies when that intent is present:

Repeated Phone Calls

Calls made with intent to harass, or causing the phone to ring repeatedly with no legitimate purpose.

Electronic Communications

Threatening or obscene texts, emails, social media messages, or direct messages sent with intent to harass.

Anonymous or Third-Party Contact

Using fake accounts, burner numbers, or contacting someone through a third party to circumvent blocking.

Threats of Harm

Threatening bodily harm to the person, their family, or their property through any communication channel.

False Reports

Falsely reporting another person’s death or serious injury to cause alarm.

Obscene Content

Sending obscene or indecent material with intent to harass — elevated to felony if the recipient is a minor.

960+Cases Dismissed or Rejected
5.0Google Rating (363 Reviews)
20+Years Austin Criminal Defense

The Hull Firm has secured over 960 dismissals or rejected cases since 2021; however, every case is unique and past results do not predict future outcomes.

Texas Penal Code §42.07 vs. Stalking vs. Disorderly Conduct

Texas defines these as separate offenses. The distinction matters for defense strategy, sentencing exposure, and plea options.

Harassment §42.07

Communication-based conduct — calls, texts, emails, social media. Class B misdemeanor at baseline. Covers electronic, in-person, and third-party contact.

Key element: intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass.

Stalking §42.072

A pattern of conduct causing the victim to fear bodily injury or death. Third-degree felony on first offense — more serious exposure than harassment.

Key element: fear of bodily injury or death on the victim’s part.

Disorderly Conduct §42.01

Disruptive public conduct — offensive gestures, unreasonable noise, public fighting. Class C or Class B misdemeanor. No communication element required.

Key element: public disturbance rather than targeted communication.

How We Defend Harassment Charges in Austin

Intent is the central issue in every harassment case under §42.07. These are the strategies we use to attack the prosecution’s case.

Challenge Intent — Legitimate Purpose

The statute requires proof of intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass. Communication with a legitimate purpose — co-parenting, business, legal matters — does not meet this element regardless of frequency.

First Amendment Challenge

Section 42.07 has been challenged on constitutional grounds. Certain speech is protected even when offensive. Where the alleged harassment involves opinion, satire, or non-threatening expression, we raise First Amendment defenses.

False or Exaggerated Allegations

Harassment charges frequently arise in domestic disputes, custody battles, and workplace conflicts — situations where allegations can be weaponized. We investigate the accuser’s motive and expose inconsistencies in the record.

Evidence Sufficiency Attack

Many harassment cases rest entirely on the complainant’s account with no corroborating evidence. We challenge the sufficiency of the state’s evidence and move to dismiss where the record cannot support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mistaken Identity — Electronic Evidence

Electronic communications can be spoofed, accounts can be compromised, and metadata can be misread. We scrutinize digital evidence to confirm it actually came from the accused and survives authentication standards.

Suppression of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence

Phone records, account data, and device contents obtained without a proper warrant or valid subpoena can be suppressed. If the state’s key evidence is inadmissible, the charge cannot survive.

Austin harassment defense attorney — The Hull Firm The Hull Firm criminal defense team — Austin Texas

Local Court Experience — Travis, Williamson & Hays County

How a harassment case is charged, prosecuted, and resolved varies by county. Local familiarity matters.

Travis County

Austin Municipal Court and Travis County Court at Law handle Class B and Class A harassment cases. Travis County may be more open to diversion programs and negotiated dismissals for first-time offenders, particularly in domestic dispute contexts.

Austin • West Lake Hills • Rollingwood • Sunset Valley

Williamson County

Georgetown-based Williamson County courts typically take a harder stance on repeated conduct and cases involving explicit threats. Early defense and pre-trial intervention are especially important in Williamson County harassment cases.

Round RockCedar ParkGeorgetownLeander

Hays County

San Marcos-based Hays County courts prioritize harassment cases involving minors or vulnerable victims and apply heightened scrutiny to electronic harassment allegations. State jail felony charges involving minors require disciplined defense from the outset.

KyleBuda • San Marcos • Dripping Springs

Texas Harassment Law §42.07 — Frequently Asked Questions

Texas Penal Code §42.07 is the Texas harassment statute. It makes it a criminal offense to intentionally communicate with another person in a way intended to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass them. Covered conduct includes repeated phone calls, threatening or obscene electronic messages (texts, emails, social media), contact through fake accounts or third parties, and false reports of injury or death. A first offense is a Class B misdemeanor. A prior harassment conviction elevates it to a Class A misdemeanor. Sending obscene content to a minor is a state jail felony.

Harassment under §42.07 is a Class B misdemeanor on a first offense, not a felony. It becomes a Class A misdemeanor if the defendant has a prior harassment conviction. It escalates to a state jail felony only when the conduct involves sending obscene or sexual content to a minor. The related offense of stalking under §42.072 is a third-degree felony on a first offense — stalking and harassment are distinct charges in Texas.

Yes. Texas Penal Code §42.07 explicitly covers electronic communications, including texts, emails, and social media direct messages. Sending a threatening or obscene message, or sending repeated messages with intent to harass, qualifies under the statute. A single text message can be sufficient to support a charge if the content and context establish intent to harass. The statute also covers contact through fake accounts or third parties used to reach someone who has blocked the sender.

Yes. Harassment charges in Texas can be dismissed or reduced through several routes: lack of sufficient evidence to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt, a successful motion to suppress unlawfully obtained evidence, pre-trial diversion programs available in Travis County for first-time offenders, or a negotiated dismissal agreement. The complainant’s cooperation affects how the DA evaluates the case, but unlike family violence cases, it is not a no-drop policy. An attorney can identify weaknesses in the evidence before the case is formally filed and apply pressure at the charging stage.

A first-offense harassment conviction under Texas Penal Code §42.07 carries up to 180 days in jail and a $2,000 fine (Class B misdemeanor). With a prior harassment conviction, the penalty increases to up to 1 year in jail and a $4,000 fine (Class A misdemeanor). If the harassment involves sending obscene content to a minor, the charge is a state jail felony with a range of 180 days to 2 years in a state jail facility and up to a $10,000 fine. A conviction at any level creates a permanent criminal record.

Legitimate purpose is a complete defense to harassment under §42.07. The statute requires intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass. Communication made for a legitimate purpose — co-parenting, business matters, legal proceedings — does not satisfy that intent element regardless of how frequently it occurred or whether the other party found it unwanted. Documenting the legitimate business or legal purpose of your communications is critical to this defense. We evaluate this in every case involving an ongoing relationship between the parties.

Attempting to circumvent a block — through fake accounts, third parties, or alternate numbers — is precisely the type of conduct courts view as strong evidence of intent to harass. Under §42.07, using a third party or anonymous account to reach someone who has blocked you is specifically covered. If you have been blocked, any further contact attempt significantly strengthens the prosecution’s case. Stop all contact immediately and call an attorney before making any further communication.

No. You have the right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment and the Texas Constitution. Anything you say to law enforcement can be used against you in a prosecution. Even if you believe you did nothing wrong, speaking to police without an attorney present is almost never in your interest — officers are gathering evidence, not verifying your innocence. Call The Hull Firm at 512-599-9999 before making any statement to law enforcement.

A harassment conviction creates a permanent criminal record visible on background checks run by employers, landlords, and professional licensing boards. Even a Class B misdemeanor conviction can disqualify you from certain jobs, security clearances, professional licenses, and housing applications. Non-citizens may face immigration consequences including deportation or inadmissibility. Depending on the final outcome, some cases may be eligible for expungement or non-disclosure under Texas law — we evaluate eligibility on every case we close.

The Attorneys Defending Your Case

Mark Hull — Austin criminal defense attorney
Mark Hull Managing Partner

20+ years Austin criminal defense. National Trial Lawyers Top 100. Litigator of the Year 2023. Practicing exclusively in criminal defense since 2003. Full bio →

Allison Tisdale — former Travis County DWI prosecutor
Allison Tisdale Managing Partner — Former Travis County Prosecutor

Chief misdemeanor prosecutor, special prosecutor for complex blood DWI cases, DA’s representative to DWI Diversion Court. Joined The Hull Firm in 2021. Full bio →

What Our Clients Say

5.0 stars • 363 Google reviews from clients across Austin, Williamson, Hays, and surrounding Central Texas counties.

Charged with Harassment in Texas? Call The Hull Firm Now.

Do not speak to law enforcement before speaking to an attorney. Available 24/7 at 512-599-9999. We handle harassment cases across Austin, Travis County, Williamson County, Hays County, and San Antonio.

For educational purposes only. Not legal advice. Contact us for a free, confidential consultation specific to your case.

1